Current Status of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics, 1st Edition
Authors :
Harlan Amstutz & Joshua Jacobs & Eddie Ebramzadeh
Long Term Results of BHR and Lessons Learned, Effect of Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques on Outcome Results of Conserve Plus, Results and Use of Mono Block Cups (Thick vs Thin), Changes in High Activity After Resurfacing, Incidence and Preve
...view more
Long Term Results of BHR and Lessons Learned, Effect of Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques on Outcome Results of Conserve Plus, Results and Use of Mono Block Cups (Thick vs Thin), Changes in High Activity After Resurfacing, Incidence and Prevention of Complications for Resurfacing, A Survey of Incidence of Pseudotumors with MOM Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers, Effects of Component Orientation, Coverage, and Design on Ion Levels and ALTR After Hip Resurfacing: A Multi-Center Study, Imaging and In Vivo Validation of MARS MRI After Hip Resurfacing, Histological Features of Femoral Hip Resurfacing with Neck Narrowing, Risk Factors and Affects on Incidence on Pseudotumors, Promising New Techniques for Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Functional Results of Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Replacement, Indications, Techniques, and Results of Revision of Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Cemented and Cementless Hip Resurfacing- A 2-5 year Follow-up
Long Term Results of BHR and Lessons Learned, Effect of Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques on Outcome Results of Conserve Plus, Results and Use of Mono Block Cups (Thick vs Thin), Changes in High Activity After Resurfacing, Incidence and Prevention of Complications for Resurfacing, A Survey of Incidence of Pseudotumors with MOM Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers, Effects of Component Orientation, Coverage, and Design on Ion Levels and ALTR After Hip Resurfacing: A Multi-Center Study, Imaging and In Vivo Validation of MARS MRI After Hip Resurfacing, Histological Features of Femoral Hip Resurfacing with Neck Narrowing, Risk Factors and Affects on Incidence on Pseudotumors, Promising New Techniques for Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Functional Results of Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Replacement, Indications, Techniques, and Results of Revision of Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Cemented and Cementless Hip Resurfacing- A 2-5 year Follow-up
Author Information
By Harlan Amstutz, MD, oint Replacement Institute at St. Vincent Medical Center
Los Angeles, CA; Joshua Jacobs, MD, Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush-St. Lukes Presbyterian
Chicago, IL and Eddie Ebramzadeh, MD, Director, Implant Biomechanics Lab
Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital-UCLA and Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, California
https://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/current-status-of-metal-on-metal-hip-resurfacing-an-issue-of-orthopedic-clinics-9781455704798.html6529Current Status of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinicshttps://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/media/catalog/product/9/7/9781455704798_7.jpg79.1998.99USDInStock/Medicine/Orthopaedics/Clinics/Clinics6643887255255041<p>Long Term Results of BHR and Lessons Learned, Effect of Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques on Outcome Results of Conserve Plus, Results and Use of Mono Block Cups (Thick vs Thin), Changes in High Activity After Resurfacing, Incidence and Prevention of Complications for Resurfacing, A Survey of Incidence of Pseudotumors with MOM Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers, Effects of Component Orientation, Coverage, and Design on Ion Levels and ALTR After Hip Resurfacing: A Multi-Center Study, Imaging and In Vivo Validation of MARS MRI After Hip Resurfacing, Histological Features of Femoral Hip Resurfacing with Neck Narrowing, Risk Factors and Affects on Incidence on Pseudotumors, Promising New Techniques for Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Functional Results of Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Replacement, Indications, Techniques, and Results of Revision of Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Cemented and Cementless Hip Resurfacing- A 2-5 year Follow-up</p> <p>Long Term Results of BHR and Lessons Learned, Effect of Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques on Outcome Results of Conserve Plus, Results and Use of Mono Block Cups (Thick vs Thin), Changes in High Activity After Resurfacing, Incidence and Prevention of Complications for Resurfacing, A Survey of Incidence of Pseudotumors with MOM Hip Resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers, Effects of Component Orientation, Coverage, and Design on Ion Levels and ALTR After Hip Resurfacing: A Multi-Center Study, Imaging and In Vivo Validation of MARS MRI After Hip Resurfacing, Histological Features of Femoral Hip Resurfacing with Neck Narrowing, Risk Factors and Affects on Incidence on Pseudotumors, Promising New Techniques for Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Functional Results of Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Replacement, Indications, Techniques, and Results of Revision of Hip Resurfacing, Comparison of Cemented and Cementless Hip Resurfacing- A 2-5 year Follow-up</p>00add-to-cart97814557047982011 and earlierProfessionalBy Harlan Amstutz, MD, Joshua Jacobs, MD and Eddie Ebramzadeh, MD20111Book178w x 254hSaunders168Apr 26, 2011IN STOCK - This may take up to 5 business days to shipBy <STRONG>Harlan Amstutz</STRONG>, MD, oint Replacement Institute at St. Vincent Medical Center
Los Angeles, CA; <STRONG>Joshua Jacobs</STRONG>, MD, Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush-St. Lukes Presbyterian
Chicago, IL and <STRONG>Eddie Ebramzadeh</STRONG>, MD, Director, Implant Biomechanics Lab
Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital-UCLA and Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, CaliforniaClinicsClinicsThe Clinics: OrthopedicsNoNoNoNoPlease SelectPlease SelectPlease Select
